Pick your jurisdiction of issuance
Checklist — what to do in Step 1
- Map your token claim type — is the holder owed title, a delivery right, an investment contract, or a cash-settled exposure? Different claims → different licences.
- List the candidate jurisdictions by your investor base (retail vs accredited vs institutional only). Retail to EU → MiCA almost certainly applies.
- Pull primary regulator framework documents: SFC Licensing Handbook, MAS CMS, ESMA MiCA, VARA rulebooks, FINMA fintech licence.
- Check tax residency consequences for the issuer entity (corporate, withholding, VAT/GST on physical delivery, redemption events).
- Confirm marketing reach: can the chosen jurisdiction lawfully solicit your target investor segment, or do you need a separate distribution entity?
- Engage qualified local counsel in the top two candidate jurisdictions before incorporating anything. Save written memos — regulators will ask later.
Each jurisdiction has a different posture toward tokenized commodities — from explicit framework (Liechtenstein TVTG, EU MiCA, Dubai VARA) to enforcement-driven (US SEC/CFTC) to case-by-case (Singapore MAS, Hong Kong SFC). The choice cascades into licence type, KYC tier, marketing rules, vault location and tax treatment.
Use the Hub Compliance Atlas for the side-by-side view: 10 jurisdictions × 6 columns (regulator, framework, licence types, KYC tier, sanctions sources, primary pages).
Open Compliance Atlas → Legal & Arbitration directory →